Show #487 Notes: Mack Maloney & Graeme Rendall

Simulcast on, KGRA Radio, YouTube & Facebook
December 28th, 6:00-8:00 PM EDT (-4GMT)

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09DRBHH1Z

BIO: Graeme Rendall is a full time author and a commentator on the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) issue. He is also a contributor to “The Debrief”, an American news website dealing with cutting edge science, tech and defence news, and also writes articles on the subject for UAP Media UK. In the early 1990s he was the Editor of an amateur aviation magazine. Graeme has written a critically-acclaimed work looking at the “Foo-Fighters” witnessed during World War Two and the numerous wartime cases that occurred before the term was coined in November 1944. He has been an aviation and World War Two history enthusiast from an early age, when he was given Airfix model aircraft kits “to keep him quiet”. He lives in rural Northumberland, not far from the border with Scotland, between the beach and the hills.

Information on Mack Maloney: https://www.mackmaloney.com/military-x-files-radio.html

2 thoughts on “Show #487 Notes: Mack Maloney & Graeme Rendall

  • January 9, 2022 at 3:13 am
    Permalink

    Hi Martin – Your guests – Graeme Rendall and Mack Malloney – spend a great deal of time in this show debunking other UFO accounts and listener’s theories, citing a lack of evidence, no paper trails or no facts – facts which you yourself Martin claim to ‘love’. However, neither of your guests provided any specific evidence or ‘facts’ to support their own accounts ( ir books). You can’t afford to play favorites Martin. For example – if, as Rendall consistently claimed – there is no advanced alien tech because we’re not currently using it ( which seems a very simplistic argument btw ) – why should we believe his accounts of ‘Foo Fighters’ and buy his book ‘UFOS before 1947’? He presented no actual factual evidence for that phenomenon? I would enjoy your Podcast more if you were more impartial in deciding which accounts or theories are credible or not…

    • January 10, 2022 at 11:11 am
      Permalink

      I really do not understand, he cited over 1,500 footnotes, researched back to first hand accounts, and talked about unfounded accounts, dead ends.

Comments are closed.